Finding Aids



HIGGINS
18AN489


INDIAN CREEK
18PR94


BEEHIVE
18HO206


KETTERING
18PR174


NASSAWANGO
18WO23

OTTER II
18CV272


FRIENDSVILLE
18GA23


BIGGS FORD
18FR14


HUGHES
18M01


CUMBERLAND
18CV171




DOMESTIC SITES

COMPTON
18CV279


PATUXENT POINT
18CV271


KINGS REACH
18CV83


KINGS REACH QTR
18CV84


SMITHS ST. LEONARD
18CV91


OXON HILL MANOR
18PR175


BENNETTS POINT
18QU28


BANNEKER
18BA282


SOTTERLEY CABIN
18ST54


SUKEEKS CABIN
18CV426


HARFORD FURNACE
18HA148


GOTTS COURT
18AP52


MECHANIC STREET
18AG206


FISCHER
18AN500

INDUSTRIAL.
&MILITARY SITES


CATOCTIN FURNACE
18FR320-1
, 323-4

SIMPSONVILLE MILL
18HO80


HOWARD-MCHENRY
MILL - 18BA100

PAWLEY KILN
18BC88


FT. FREDERICK
18WA20


PT. LOOKOUT HOSP.
18ST61


MAPS

PHOTO GALLERY

HOMEPAGE

      
 

KING’S REACH
18CV83

Introduction

King’s Reach (18CV83) part of the Richard Smith Jr. Plantation, is a tobacco plantation homelot site occupied from 1690 until 1711 in Calvert County, Maryland. The site is located on the grounds of the Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum and is associated with a nearby quarter (18CV84) and a large tobacco barn (18CV85). The archaeological traces of a house with a hall-parlor plan and two attached sheds, along with a one-room quarter, were uncovered at 18CV83. King’s Reach is probably the home of Richard Smith, Jr., a wealthy colonist with close ties to the Calvert family. Documentary evidence suggests that Smith probably inherited the property in 1689 and lived at King’s Reach until 1711, when he constructed a new dwelling elsewhere on the plantation.

King’s Reach was occupied at an important point in the history of Maryland, when the colony’s tobacco economy was in a severe and prolonged depression and the transition to a predominantly slave labor force was well underway. Although Smith was fairly well-to-do, he lived in an impermanent, earthfast dwelling. The King’s Reach collection, which is striking in its size and variety, suggests that Smith invested his wealth in portable household goods. In 1711, as the tobacco economy was beginning to strengthen, Smith abandoned King’s Reach for a large house constructed at least partially of brick (18CV91). The King’s Reach assemblage has the potential to shed light on the material conditions of life in this transitional period.

The King’s Reach site complex is representative of the mid-size tobacco plantations that dominated the Chesapeake region during the late 17th and early 18th centuries, a period when the tobacco economy was in prolonged depression. The assemblage from the main house, 18CV83, can be used to address issues ranging from standards of living during the tobacco economy depression to the organization of plantation homelots at the end of the 17th century. The collection can also provide evidence of material conditions for servants and slaves as the transformation to a slave economy was underway. Plow zone materials reveal the use of domestic space on the plantation, while the relatively large collection of Border wares provides useful data for investigating this ware type in Maryland.

Archaeological Investigations

The King’s Reach Site was identified in 1981, when a preliminary survey by Wayne Clark and Michael Smolek revealed a concentration of nails, brick, glass, ceramics, tobacco pipe fragments, and other domestic and structural debris from an early colonial site. After the creation of Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum in 1983, King’s Reach was selected as the first site to be excavated by staff archaeologists. A systematic surface collection across an area measuring 50-by-60-meters in 1984 allowed better definition of site boundaries and artifact concentrations. Excavation began in June 1984 and lasted for two summers, with additional limited excavations in 1987. One hundred and sixteen two-by-two-meter units were excavated in the site core, while 28 were systematically distributed in the outlying area. All plow zone soil was screened through 3/8-inch mesh. An extensive complex of subsurface features was exposed in the plantation core. All features were recorded, and selected ones were excavated. Soils from excavated features was screened through -inch mesh, with some portions water screened through 1/16-inch mesh. In addition, soil chemical samples were systematically taken from the plow zone across the site, and tests were run on phosphates, calcium, and potassium.

The site plan of 18CV83 consists of two earthfast buildings with a connecting foreyard. The one-story main dwelling measured 30-by-20-feet, divided into a hall and kitchen with a sleeping loft above. The building’s source of heat was a wood-framed, mud-lined hood and chimney set on a brick hearth in the kitchen. A ten-foot wide trench-set wooden shed extended along the rear of the structure, while a five-by-seven-foot post-supported shed was attached to the north gable. An unusual feature of the main house was the presence of at least six cellars below the wooden floor of the structure. Two cellars appear to have had specialized functions: a possible root cellar in front of the hearth and a dairy cooling pit in the small shed. The remaining four cellars appear to represent successive generations of general storage pits which were replaced when walls collapsed. One doorway led from the kitchen to the foreyard, while a second led outside from the rear-set shed.

The second structure, measuring 20-by-10-feet, was possibly a quarter for servants or slaves. A chimneyless hearth on the west side of the building appears to have heated the structure, and a single eight-foot square cellar served as general storage. One doorway led into the foreyard toward the main house, and a second was placed on the east gable. Two generations of ditch-set fences joined this building and the main dwelling to form the foreyard.

The King’s Reach dwelling appears to have been abandoned around 1711, when the Smith family moved to a new residence on the property. This new dwelling was of at least partial brick construction. Nearby outbuildings included a kitchen, storehouse, barn, slave quarter, and wheat barn.

Artifacts

A total of 66,371 artifacts were recovered during the investigations at 18CV83. These included architectural, kitchen, and furniture objects, personal items, tools, arms, horse furniture, and food remains. Given that the dwelling was fairly modest, the household apparently invested a notable portion of its wealth in portable material goods, as indicated by the costly and abundant artifacts recovered.

One hundred and fifty-three ceramic vessels were identified from the site. The majority of these vessels were tin-glazed earthenwares, Border wares, Staffordshire-type slipwares, black-glazed earthenwares, Buckley-type earthenwares, Red Sandy earthenwares, Rhenish blue and gray stoneware, and English brown stoneware. Numerous tin-glazed earthenware sherds exhibited blue or polychrome hand-painted motifs, possibly representing sets of matching ceramics. Border wares had both clear and green lead glazes on interior surfaces. Red Border ware was also recovered at the site. A total of 4,322 glass artifacts were found at King’s Reach. While this assemblage consisted mostly of wine and case bottle fragments, 144 table glass fragments, 64 mirror fragments, 19 beads, 14 medicine bottle fragments, 13 window glass fragments, one unidentified bottle seal, and one black glass button with a white and yellow hand-painted flower were also found.

Metal objects reflect various personal and farm-related activities that were occurring at King’s Reach. A number of iron farm implements were recovered, including two hoe fragments, two axe head fragments, two chain link fragments, a collar stud, a pintle, a scythe, and a number of unidentified tools. Forty small lead shot, nine musket balls, one gun barrel, and 29 casting waste fragments, were among the arms artifacts found at King’s Reach. Horse furniture included four unidentified harness parts, three buckles, three bridle bit fragments, two bosses, and two stirrups, while kitchen-related artifacts included 39 knife blade fragments, four pewter spoons, and three copper alloy spoons. Locking mechanisms from King’s Reach consisted of five key fragments, four padlock fragments, three other lock fragments, and one latch, while sewing implements included 215 straight pins, eight scissors fragments, and two thimble fragments.

Personal artifacts included three copper alloy decorative buckles, three copper alloy book hinges, two iron smoker’s companions, one copper alloy finger ring, a set of copper alloy cuff links, and a whistle fabricated from a white clay tobacco pipe stem fragment. Among other metal artifacts recovered from King’s Reach are seven lead bale seals, three possible lead weights, two curtain rings, two copper alloy pestles, and a copper alloy screen.

Records

The document collection consists of original records in good condition, with minimal stains from field exposure. The records are housed in eight letter-sized clamshell archival storage boxes, two oversized enclosures, and two oversized document rolls.

The excavation records are organized by unit number. Records consist of excavation unit forms, excavation stratum registers, cross-section drawings and cross-section keys, plan drawings and plan keys, and profile drawings and profile keys. Records are present for 65 units.

Field journals covering June through September 1984, June through October 1985, November through December 1987, April 1988, and September 1988 are found in the collection. Other documents include maps, surface collection and test unit artifact catalogs, tobacco pipe catalogs, artifact catalog data sheets, survey logs, surface collection forms, and conserved artifact records. These have been scanned as .PDF files and are not searchable.

Two publications on King’s Reach were scanned as .PDF files: an article by Dennis Pogue entitled “Analysis of the King's Reach Plantation Homelot, Ca.1690-1715,” and a file report by Julia A. King.

Photographs taken on-site or in post-processing are available through the online database, and are searchable using the above criteria. Researchers should note that images are not linked directly to specific documents, and photographs records do not necessarily exist for all features or units. Original images consist of slides and prints, and are housed at the MAC Lab.

References

Galke, Laura
2000  

King’s Reach Site (c.1690-1715). Ms. on file, Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory.

Gaynor, Jay
 

"Tooles of all sorts to worke": A Brief Look at Trade Tools in 17th-Century Virginia. In The Archaeology of 17th-Century Virginia. Special Publication No. 30 of the Archeological Society of Virginia. Dietz Press, Richmond, VA.

1993  
Holt, Cheryl A.
n.d.  

King’s Reach Plantation Homelot, 18CV83, Faunal Analysis. Ms. on file, Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory.

 
King, Julia A.
n.d.   18CV85 File Report. Ms. on file, Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory.
Pogue, Dennis J.
1988
     Spatial Analysis of the King's Reach Plantation Homelot, Ca.1690-1715. Historical Archaeology 22(2):40-56

1990


 

King’s Reach and 17th-Century Plantation Life. Jefferson Patterson Park & Museum Studies in Archaeology No. 1. Maryland Historical & Cultural Publications, Annapolis, MD.

 
1991



Clay Tobacco Pipes from Four 17th century Domestic Sites in the Lower Patuxent River Valley of Maryland. In The Archaeology of the Clay Tobacco Pipe XII: Chesapeake Bay. BAR International Series 566, Oxford, England.

1997 Culture Change Along the Tobacco Coast: 1670-1720. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, American University, Washington, DC.
 
         
Pogue, Dennis J. and Patricia J. McGuire
1988   Servant Versus Planter: Household Assemblages From The King’s Reach Site (ca.1690-1715) Calvert County, Maryland. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Baltimore, Maryland.

 

 
    BACK     MAP(S)    -NEXT
  IMAGES    
 
   

Thank you for visiting our web site. If you have any questions, comments,
or new information to share, please contact us at psamford@mdp.state.md.us.

 

Copyright © 2003 by
Maryland Archaeological Conservation Lab